Methodological proposal to evaluate the degree of development of innovation in small companies applying the polar diagrammer technique

Authors

  • Dr. Rafael O. Sainz Zamora UAEM
  • Lic. Guadalupe Elizabeth Zermeño Padilla UAEM
  • Lic.Ángel Cruz Villa UAEM
  • Ing. Uziel Mejia Mendoza UAEM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18583/umr.v1i2.16

Keywords:

Evaluation, Development, Innovation, Small business, Polar diagram

Abstract

For companies, the change is the process through which one becomes, in a different way, what it was at an earlier time. It is the age of accelerated changes for innovation, in almost, all areas of human activities. Toffler (2006) maintains that “The values to proclaim within the innovation process are curiosity, thought, creativity, individuality and entrepreneurial spirit.”

Innovation does not only associates to the product or service but it involves the entire company; in their strategies, processes, marketing and distribution of products or services that are offered. This is initiated by the staff of the company, provided that the conditions and enabling environments are taken by the company at one time. For Hamel (2000) the company combines four components: the relationship with the client, the key strategy, strategic resources and the value connections, where the innovative enterprise redefines totally or partially some of these concepts. But success goes out indisputably from the current human talent and its development. Thus, the SMEs must identify the primary factors that allow a diagnosis of potentiality for innovation. Such factors are representative of the human
characteristics and organization elements the company must have.

In this paper the basic elements are presented, which are required for small businesses to identify and assess its potential in terms of innovation. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auckenthaler y D´Huy, P. 2003. L´innovation collec-tive. Liaisons, Paris.

Chambers, J. Cleveland W. Kleiner, P. y Tukey P. 1983. Graphical Methods for data analysis (Statistics). Amazon Price, USA.

Ettlie, J. 2003. Managing Technological Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, USA.

Freud, S. 1981. Obras Completas. Ed. Biblioteca Nue-va, Madrid.

Gervilla, E. 1992. Postmodernidad y educación. Edi-torial Dykinson, Madrid.

Hamel. 2000. Competindo pelo futuro. Campus Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Henderson, B. 1896. The origin of strategy. Harvard Business School, USA.

Leal, S. y Urrea, J. 2013. Ingenio y Pasión. LID Edi-torial Empresarial, Colombia.

Levy. 1998. Managing High Technology and Innova-tion, Prentice Hall, USA.

Mcadam, R. 2004. Knowledge Creation and Idea Ge-neration: A Critical Quality Perspective”, Technova-tion, USA, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00169-4

Nonaka, I. y Takeuchi, H. 1999. La Organización Creadora del Conocimiento: Cómo las Compañías Ja-ponesas Crean la Dinámica de la Innovación. Oxford University Press, México.

Elkjaer, B. 2001. The learning organization: an unde-livered promise. Management Learning, USA, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507601324002

Escorsa y Vall. 2003. La Tecnología e innovación en la empresa. Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, España.

Paz, O. 1987. México en la obra de Octavio Paz: I. El Peregrino en su patria. Fondo de cultura Económica, México.

Ponti, F. 2001. La empresa creativa. Granica, Barce-lona.

Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press, USA.

Ritter, M. 2008. Cultura organizacional. La Crujía, Buenos Aires.

Salinas, A. y Dorrego, P. 2005. Estrategias de Pymes Exitosas. Dorrego Consultores, Bogotá.

Souder, W. y Sherman D. 1994. Managing New Tech-nology Development. Mc Graw-Hill, USA.

Toffler 2006. La revolución de la riqueza. Random House, México.

Wagensberg J. 2011. Más árboles que ramas. Tusquets, México.

Watzlawick P 2003. Cambio, Herder, México.

Published

2016-08-31

How to Cite

Sainz Zamora, D. R. O., Zermeño Padilla, L. G. E., Cruz Villa, L., & Mejia Mendoza, I. U. (2016). Methodological proposal to evaluate the degree of development of innovation in small companies applying the polar diagrammer technique. UPGTO Management Review, 1(2), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.18583/umr.v1i2.16

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS